Start with the recommendation you want agreed : summarise the key supporting insights : only then offer any key analysis. See the blog.
As a junior planning analyst and consultant, when it came to presenting my findings and recommendations, I thought the way to do it was:
… explain the analysis I had done
… show the insights that emerged from that analysis
… justify the recommendations that followed from those conclusions
Then I wondered why the people I worked for didn’t go along with my irrefutable logic and accept my recommendations. Sometimes we never got to the recommendations, because they would start picking away at things in the analysis they didn’t understand or agree with.
Then I came across Barbara Minto’s great little book “The Pyramid Principle”, which basically turns this logic upside down:
… start with the key recommendation, or issue you want agreed
… summarise the key insights that lead to this recommendation
… then only explain any supporting analysis that their questions call for (the not-pale supporting evidences in this figure)

I now realise that the principle has a huge benefit for how we actually do the work in the first place – but I will say more about that next time.
_____________
Get these insights directly with my insight-emails at sdl.re/getinsights … and you get a FREE article on implementing strategy – a key topic, needing much better tools.
Categories: : strategy